All Posts

Most ChatGPT vs. Claude comparisons test essay writing and coding. Finance is a different game entirely — and the results are more decisive than you'd expect. Wall Street Prep's 2026 financial modeling benchmark placed Claude at 5.5 out of 10 versus ChatGPT at just 2.5 out of 10. Claude was the only AI tested that correctly backsolve EBITDA from a three-statement model. That's not a rounding error — it's a 2-point gap on a task that defines FP&A accuracy. But financial modeli

Scenario planning is the task every FP&A team knows they should do more of — and the one that gets cut first when deadlines tighten. Only 32% of FP&A teams currently use AI for scenario planning, even though 79% have adopted some form of AI (Drivetrain, 2025). The gap isn't about willingness — it's about workflow friction. Traditional scenario planning takes weeks. You build three models manually, cross-check assumptions across each, reconcile formulas, and present results th

Here's the uncomfortable truth about FP&A tool adoption: 79% of finance teams say they're using AI, but only 34% actually apply it to forecasting and budgeting decisions (Drivetrain, 2025). The rest are automating spreadsheet formatting and calling it transformation. The tool market isn't helping. There are now dozens of platforms claiming "AI-powered FP&A" — and most of them are wrapping a ChatGPT API call around a basic dashboard. This guide cuts through the noise with actu

Here's a number that should bother every CFO still running forecasts in Excel: 79% of FP&A teams now use AI — but only 34% apply it to actual forecasting and budget decisions (Drivetrain, 2025). The rest? They're automating spreadsheet formatting. That's like buying a Ferrari to drive to the mailbox. The gap between teams using AI for real forecasting and those stuck on operational automation is widening fast. And the accuracy difference isn't marginal — it's the kind of impr

McKinsey's estimate that generative AI could create $200-340 billion in annual value for banking alone is the most-cited statistic in every GenAI board presentation. It's also the most misunderstood. The number refers to the full financial services sector, across all functions, under optimistic deployment assumptions. It tells you the opportunity is real and large. It tells you almost nothing about what your finance team can actually capture. Finance leaders are being asked t

Microsoft released Finance Agents as part of Microsoft 365 Wave 2 in November 2025. SAP introduced Joule for Finance. Workday has its own AI-powered Copilot. Every major finance platform now has an AI agent story. The question isn't whether a finance copilot is available — it's how to configure one that actually works for your workflows, your data, and your governance requirements. Most finance copilot implementations fail not because the AI is incapable. They fail because th

The corporate treasurer's job has always required synthesizing more data than any human can comfortably process: bank statements across 20+ accounts, FX positions across multiple currencies, intra-day cash positions, 13-week rolling forecasts, and covenant calculations — all in real time. Generative AI doesn't replace that judgment. It removes the 80% of the work that's data gathering, table formatting, and first-draft writing. Treasury was an AI laggard for years. High data

An investment brief for a public company typically takes a senior analyst 8–10 hours: read the 10-K, parse the earnings call, build the comps table, draft the narrative. A financial services firm using generative AI now does the same workflow in under 30 minutes. The AI reads faster, pulls every footnote, and never misses a line-item revision buried in Note 12. Most finance teams know AI can read documents. Few have a structured, verified workflow that produces outputs they'd

In 2025, Vals AI published the Finance Agent benchmark — a rigorous test of multi-step financial analysis tasks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scored 63.3%. GPT-5 scored 59%. That's useful data. But it doesn't tell you which model to use for your team. Generic AI benchmarks don't map to finance workflows. A score on document parsing doesn't tell you how a model handles your ERP data, your board narrative, or your month-end close process. Every CFO and FP&A lead deserves a clearer answer

The traditional FP&A forecast cycle runs like this: analysts spend 70–80% of their time pulling data, consolidating models, and chasing business unit inputs. By the time the numbers are clean, there are three days left to actually analyze them. Agentic AI flips this entirely. The data consolidation, model refresh, and baseline forecast generation happen overnight. Analysts arrive to outputs, not inputs. Most CFOs are still thinking about AI as a tool that makes analysts faste

Claude leads the Finance Agent benchmark at 63.3%, outperforming ChatGPT (59%) on multi-step financial analysis tasks. Financial models that historically require 4–6 hours now finish in under 40 minutes with Claude in Excel. Here's the tested workflow guide for finance professionals ready to move from "I've heard of Claude" to "this is part of my daily workflow." Most "AI for finance" guides give generic advice: use AI for variance commentary, use AI for 10-K analysis. Financ

You've used ChatGPT to draft a board narrative. You've asked Claude to summarize a 10-K. That's generative AI — you prompted it, it responded. Now imagine the AI didn't wait to be asked. It found the variance, traced it to three line items, drafted the commentary, and sent it for review before you opened your laptop. That's an AI agent. The term is everywhere in 2026. Finance software vendors, consulting firms, and technology platforms all have an AI agent story. But most exp

Every quarter, finance teams spend the equivalent of two full workweeks just gathering and cleaning data. According to FP&A Trends' 2025 benchmark survey, 46% of FP&A professional time goes toward data collection and validation — not analysis, not strategy, not the work that actually shapes business decisions. That's the problem AI is solving in financial planning and analysis. Not replacing analysts. Eliminating the 46%. This guide covers every major AI application in FP&A —

Where Should CFOs Focus AI Investment First? NVIDIA's 2026 State of AI in Financial Services survey found that 89% of respondents reported AI increased revenue and decreased costs simultaneously and 97% plan to increase AI investment (NVIDIA, 2026). But "increase AI investment" without specificity is how budgets evaporate. The CFOs seeing real returns are focused on five use cases, in order of impact. Use Case 1: Financial Forecasting AI reduces forecast errors by 20-50% comp

McKinsey estimates generative AI could deliver $200 to $340 billion in annual value for banking alone equivalent to 9 to 15% of operating profits. Yet most finance teams are still using AI to draft emails and summarize documents. The gap between what's possible and what's deployed is the CFO's opportunity in 2026. The term "generative AI" is used to describe everything from a consumer chatbot to a fully autonomous finance agent closing reconciliations overnight. CFOs need a c